Thermal performance comparison of DVIP with conventional insulation materials

Thermal performance comparison of DVIP with conventional insulation materials

First principles—what we are comparing

Two numbers matter for designers and decision-makers:

  • Thermal conductivity (λ): material property in W/m·K; the lower it is, the better the insulator.
  • U-value: heat flow through the whole layer or assembly in W/m²·K; again, lower is better.

Our (Sanyou London) 30 mm Decorative Integrated Vacuum Insulation Panel (DVIP) has λ ≈ 0.007 W/m·K and a design U ≈ 0.22 W/m²·K—achieved in a slim, factory-made panel that is also the exterior finish.


Thermal showdown—millimetres vs. centimetres

To make this useful on a drawing, here is the thickness conventional materials need to match DVIP’s U ≈ 0.22 W/m²·K (single-layer equivalence; films, fixings and substrates add small corrections):

Insulation typeDeclared λ (W/m·K)Thickness to reach U≈0.22 W/m²·K
DVIP (Sanyou London)0.00730 mm (given)
Rock mineral wool0.034≈155 mm
Glass mineral wool0.044≈200 mm
PIR board0.022≈100 mm
EPS foam0.036≈164 mm
XPS foam0.033≈150 mm

Result: one 3 cm DVIP tile achieves the same order of U-value that bulk products reach only at 10–20 cm. That frees net internal area, trims façade depth, and reduces bracket sizes and crane weight—without compromising performance.


Interpreting the “headline” λ values

  • DVIP: λ ≈ 0.007 W/m·K at 30 mmU ≈ 0.22 W/m²·K (design value).
  • Rock mineral wool: λ ≈ 0.034 (even at 250 mm thickness, λ is still 0.034 because λ is a material property, not a thickness).
  • Glass mineral wool: λ ≈ 0.044 (at 200 mm).
  • PIR: λ ≈ 0.022 (at 180 mm).
  • EPS/XPS: λ ≈ 0.036/0.033 (at 100 mm).

The takeaway is not that conventional insulation cannot reach low U-values; it can—if you add a lot of thickness. The point is efficiency per millimetre: DVIP delivers very low U in very little depth, with the decorative finish and fire class built in.


Why DVIP’s 30 mm can beat bulky stacks in real buildings

  1. Space economics: 150–200 mm inside a flat often costs several square metres of sellable or usable area across a floorplate. 30 mm preserves layouts and window proportions.
  2. Detailing and psi-values: bulky insulation struggles at slab edges, brackets and reveals. Thin, cut-to-shape DVIP returns reduce linear thermal bridges, improving the true heat-loss picture beyond centre-of-panel U.
  3. Programme certainty: one panel replaces multiple layers—fewer trades, fewer interfaces, fewer weather delays.
  4. Whole-life performance: vacuum cores with barrier skins and getter/desiccant keep λ very low for decades; there is no fibre slump or compression loss at fixings.
  5. Fire and finish in one: your DVIP configuration carries Class A1 façade options and architectural skins; you are not stacking a combustible insulant behind a separate fire sheet and then adding a finish.

Fair comparisons engineers appreciate

A) “Match DVIP’s U with bulk insulation—how thick?”

Already shown above: 100–200 mm for typical PIR and wools.

B) “Match a very thick mineral-wool target—what DVIP depth?”

If a project demands, say, U ≈ 0.14 W/m²·K (roughly a 250 mm rock-wool wall centre-of-panel), the equivalent DVIP thickness is ≈50 mm. We can supply custom thicknesses or twin-layer DVIP cassettes where codes or clients want ultra-low U with minimal build-up.


Operational meaning, not just maths

At a winter ΔT = 20 °C, a wall at U ≈ 0.22 leaks ≈4.4 W/m², where older uninsulated masonry might leak 30–70 W/m². Over a 50 m² elevation, that is 130–330 W less heat bleeding continuously—quieter plant, steadier surface temperatures, and a measurable drop in bills. In summer, the same resistance slows heat ingress, softening late-afternoon HVAC spikes.


Practical specification notes (to land the advantage on site)

  • Declare the assembly U-value with substrates, rails and cavity; we provide U- and ψ-value sketches for tender.
  • Use factory sizing: DVIP panels are cut to your façade grid, with reinforced edge zones for fixings; avoid site drilling through the vacuum core.
  • Detail reveals and slab edges with pre-cut returns; this is where DVIP’s thinness removes bridges conventional layers cannot treat cleanly.
  • Fire strategy: select the A1 configuration appropriate to your rails and cavity ventilation; document as an assembly.
  • Durability: our accelerated ageing indicates ≥ 35 years before any modest thermal drift begins; panels are waterproof, freeze–thaw stable, anti-ageing.

When to choose DVIP over thick conventional layers

  • Depth-constrained façades (balconies, parapets, planning set-outs, sightlines).
  • Heritage and premium schemes where proportions and internal area are non-negotiable.
  • Fast reclads and occupied retrofits where fewer trades reduce risk and time on the scaffold.
  • Hot- and cold-edge elevations where treating psi-values makes the comfort difference.

Next steps—turn the comparison into your façade plan

  • Contact our Customer Service Team for full spec sheets, BIM objects and payback calculators tailored to your wall build-ups.
  • Prefer a direct conversation? Email or phone Professor Saim Memon for a free façade assessment and a thickness/weight/U-value strategy matched to your grid and brackets.
  • Explore the range, videos, FAQs and purchasing process at www.sanyoulondon.com.

Bottom line: Side-by-side, our DVIP delivers target U-values in millimetres that foams and wools need centimetres for—saving space, weight and energy while simplifying construction.



FOLLOW SANYOU LONDON

   


Author

google Scholar